Britain, Terrorists Welcome!
•
25 Sep 2011, 18:14
•
Journals
Now I'm not one for touting the Daily Mails right wing agenda, but this I cannot disagree with:
"A terrorist who helped would-be bombers prepare an attack on London's transport network has been spotted travelling on the capital's buses and tubes.
Siraj Yassin Abdullah Ali, who helped clean up the bomb factory used by the 21/7 terrorist gang, was seen on a bus and going into Willesden Green Tube station in north west London.
The 35-year-old was jailed for nine years in 2008 but released on bail early. He cannot be deported."
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2041629/21-7-terrorist-Siraj-Yassin-Abdullah-Ali-pictured-using-public-transport-London.html#ixzz1Yz9nw0ZX
"A terrorist who helped would-be bombers prepare an attack on London's transport network has been spotted travelling on the capital's buses and tubes.
Siraj Yassin Abdullah Ali, who helped clean up the bomb factory used by the 21/7 terrorist gang, was seen on a bus and going into Willesden Green Tube station in north west London.
The 35-year-old was jailed for nine years in 2008 but released on bail early. He cannot be deported."
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2041629/21-7-terrorist-Siraj-Yassin-Abdullah-Ali-pictured-using-public-transport-London.html#ixzz1Yz9nw0ZX
man u brits are krazy z_Z
So I would be careful to accept this as their main reason for the implementing that rule. I don't know what your source is ofcourse, I'm not from Brittain :)
I'm pretty sure they are using BCE or CE now I think.
I just stated I find it reasonable to be mad at, although it's justice. ;)
who even gives a fuck?
he had protection and then commited acts of terrorism, terrorists shouldnt get protection from a country they commit terrorism against, they break the rules they leave themselves open to the consequences
half an eye at best, time for the other half
Let us be clear, he was imprisoned for failing to report a planned crime. A severe crime yes, and I imagine he got a more severe sentence than someone failing to report any other planned murder.
How many kids with stones and slogans have your brothers, sisters and family members put down today? They're only dogs after all, right?
What you're experiencing isn't terrorism, it's a fight for liberation.
Ghandi was a freedom fighter, the Dalai Lamah(which, by the way, I've met in person a few months ago in India) is a freedom fighter, mr. Ali over here who tried helping people blow up your(you're British I believe, correct me if I'm wrong) metro station, isn't a freedom fighter, but a terrorist.
your argument of "people aren't terrorists but criminals" is invalid because then you can also argue people aren't rapists and thieves, but mere criminals.
a rapist is not welcomed in public and should pay for what he did, hence he's put to jail.
a terrorist who's trying to crumble your government and change your way of life by violence and blood is not(should be) welcomed in your country. his punishment is debatable but granting him freedom is absorbed.
have a sweet and happy new jewish year, by the way :)
Commit a crime, serve a sentence aimed to punish and rehabilitate, get released based on whatever bail conditions and once you've exhausted those you're a free man. Those are the rules, the laws. There's no exception, no special case. Either you're judged no longer a threat to society when you're released or you should remain in prison.
If you're released whilst a threat well then we need to look again at our prison sentences.
As a nation we don't believe in torture, don't believe in the state murdering its citizens or those under its house. To send a man to his death is the same as doing the deed oneself.
*And by that I mean, you can't just say 'terrorism isn't a thing'.
Murder is still murder in my book.
> Daily Mail